What the UAE Is Doing With Agentic AI — And What India Can Learn?

Picture of Editor - CyberMedia Research

Editor - CyberMedia Research

While the whole world is still experimenting with agentic AI, the UAE has moved beyond policymaking, and it is quietly rebuilding governance around AI agents. AI in government usually means chatbots, dashboards, or some analytics tool sitting in the background. The UAE is doing something very different. 

It is not just adding AI to government systems. It is redesigning those systems to be AI-native. And that distinction changes everything.

While most countries are still figuring out how to digitise forms better, the UAE is building agentic AI systems that can predict needs, make decisions within defined frameworks, and execute tasks without waiting for a human to push a button. That’s not automation. That’s administrative redesign.

From Portals to Proactive Governance

Take Abu Dhabi’s push through the Department of Government Enablement and the TAMM 4.0 platform. Traditionally, government portals wait for citizens to log in, fill out forms, upload documents, and then wait some more.

The UAE is trying to flip that.

Instead of asking citizens to remember renewals, payments, or procedural requirements, the system predicts them. If a license is about to expire, if a fine needs settlement, if a service can be bundled — the platform can initiate the process. The citizen moves from being an applicant to being a participant in an AI-orchestrated workflow.

This reduces friction. But more importantly, it changes the psychology of governance. The system becomes anticipatory rather than reactive.

AI Inside the Government Machine

What’s even more interesting is that the UAE is not limiting AI to citizen-facing services.

The Federal Authority for Government Human Resources has introduced an AI HR Agent that handles employee services in Arabic and English, across written and voice channels. This is not a FAQ bot. It processes requests, manages internal workflows, and resolves administrative queries without constant human supervision.

In finance, the Dubai Department of Finance launched Project ASCEND. This system automates financial transaction verification and complex audit processes. That means AI is not just helping draft emails — it is checking numbers, verifying compliance, and supporting fiscal governance.

Then there’s the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation and its AI-powered system “Eye,” which automates work permit processing and document verification. In a country where expatriates form the majority of the workforce, efficiency in labour governance is directly tied to economic performance. AI here becomes a competitiveness tool.

The real leap, however, comes at the policy level.

The UAE Cabinet established a Regulatory Intelligence Office that uses centralized AI systems to monitor the impact of laws and suggest updates based on real-time data. That means legislation itself is being observed, measured, and potentially refined with AI assistance. Very few governments in the world are willing to let AI sit this close to lawmaking.

Why the UAE Model Is Working

There is a tendency to assume that the UAE can move fast simply because it is smaller. That’s partially true, but size is not the main factor.

Strategy is – all of this is aligned with the UAE’s National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2031. It’s not a collection of experiments, instead it’s a coordinated direction.

There are four quiet pillars holding this up:

First, localisation. AI agents operate fluently in Arabic and English. In a multilingual environment, language capability is not optional — it determines adoption.

Second, integration. These agents are not floating tools. They are embedded into existing ERPs, CRMs, and financial systems. The goal is to enhance workflows, not replace entire infrastructures overnight.

Third, compliance and data residency. With strict Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) requirements, deployments are built on sovereign infrastructure. Data stays within national boundaries. That’s critical in finance and governance.

Fourth, scalability. The UAE is not building single-use pilots. It is building expandable frameworks. One department today. Another tomorrow. Same architecture. That discipline is what separates ambition from execution.

So, where Does India Stand?

India is not behind in digital infrastructure. Aadhaar, UPI, DigiLocker — these are global benchmarks. But India’s governance model is still largely portal-based. Where you apply, you upload, and you wait for a response.

The UAE model suggests something else — a system where AI identifies eligibility for welfare schemes before a citizen applies. Where compliance reminders are proactive. Where regulatory impact is measured continuously instead of through periodic committees.

India’s scale makes this harder. But it also makes it more necessary.

There’s another dimension India cannot ignore — language. The UAE deals with bilingual complexity. India deals with dozens of major languages and hundreds of dialects. If agentic AI is deployed here, it cannot be English-first or Hindi-first. It has to be multilingual by design.

Then comes regulation. India’s legislative environment is often layered and overlapping. MSMEs struggle with compliance not because they resist it, but because it’s complicated. An AI-based regulatory intelligence system — similar in spirit to what the UAE Cabinet is attempting — could simplify compliance and reduce friction for businesses.

But this would require political and institutional comfort with AI assisting governance at a structural level. And that’s the real question.

The Bigger Picture

The UAE is not treating AI as a tool for efficiency alone. It is treating it as infrastructure for governance.

If successful, agentic AI in the UAE will redefine how citizens interact with the state. The system will not wait. It will anticipate, while executing within defined guardrails and learning continuously.

India has the digital backbone to attempt something similar. What it needs is the strategic shift — from digitisation to autonomy. The debate is no longer about whether governments should use AI. 

The debate is about how much decision-making logic governments are willing to redesign around it.